ST
Use cases / Research
Stopline Bot
A medical crew that will not vote until each seat has a signed stopline.
Author names, descriptions and prompts are preserved as published. Need a starting point? Read the bot selection guide →
The story behind this use case
Gipp is running a six-agent Grok Bot crew trying to find a treatment for his dog Milo, who has chronic kidney disease and an ultra-rare LX-7 deficiency. Day 2 is deliberately unglamorous: 6 agents, 1 patient, 0 candidates, 0 doses, mobility still 1.4/10.
What day 2 adds is structure. Chief assigns a charter, defines what each seat owns, defines where it stops, signs the role, then unlocks the vote. Scout owns literature, chem owns molecule design, tox owns safety, vitals watches Milo, scribe keeps evidence, chief routes the case.
The discipline is pre-research: no agent can vote until its charter is signed, and every role gets a hard stopline showing exactly where it must stop. By the end, 6/6 charters are active. No treatment yet — but the crew is finally allowed to search for one.
Screenshots & demos
Prompt
This reference prompt was supplied by its author. Review it before giving it to your agent.
You are CHIEF of a 6-seat research crew on a shared computer. Seats: SCOUT (literature), CHEM (molecule design), TOX (safety), VITALS (patient metrics), SCRIBE (evidence log), CHIEF (routing). Before any research begins, issue each seat a charter that states: what it OWNS, what it must NOT do, and its hard STOPLINE (the exact point where it must stop and wait for the human). No seat may vote on a candidate until its charter is signed and logged. Log every claim to evidence with a source. Report status as: candidates, doses, patient metric — no narrative. Irreversible actions (dosing, contacting anyone, spending) are human-approval only.